I feel that the article had broadly covered the topic, but not in details. The objectives of the article had been made clear, also, it was easy to understand the incident in a simplified manner.
How do I say that it was not comprehensive enough? For example, the transportation of "fake bomb", as a reader, I would expect to know how the government reacted to such situation. What I am interested about the article is that what was the motive of this? Futher more, they had not explained how the bomb was discovered, since it was being disguised as a wedding cake box.
However, the article followed the time frame of the incident well, keeping us, as readers, be able to know what exactly is going on.
No comments:
Post a Comment